We consider the problem of probabilistic allocation of objects under ordinal preferences. We devise an allocation mechanism, called the vigilant eating rule (VER), that applies to nearly arbitrary feasibility constraints. It is constrained ordinally efficient, can be computed efficiently for a large class of constraints, and treats agents equally if they have the same preferences and are subject to the same constraints. When the set of feasible allocations is convex, we also present a characterization of our rule based on ordinal egalitarianism. Our results about VER do not just apply to allocation problems but to all collective choice problems in which agents have ordinal preferences over discrete outcomes. As a case study, we assume objects have priorities for agents and apply VER to sets of probabilistic allocations that are constrained by stability. VER coincides with the (extended) probabilistic serial rule when priorities are flat and the agent proposing deterministic deferred acceptance algorithm when preferences and priorities are strict. While VER always returns a stable and constrained efficient allocation, it fails to be strategyproof, unconstrained efficient, and envy-free. We show, however, that each of these three properties is incompatible with stability and constrained efficiency.
翻译:我们考虑的是按正统偏好分配对象的概率问题。我们设计了一个分配机制,称为谨慎饮食规则(VER),它适用于几乎任意的可行性限制。它具有约束性或效率,可以有效地计算出一大批制约因素,如果它们有相同的偏好,并且受到同样的限制,则对代理人一视同仁。当一套可行的分配办法是相互交错时,我们也呈现了我们规则的特征。我们关于VER的结果不仅适用于分配问题,而且适用于所有集体选择问题,即代理人对异端结果有偏好。作为案例研究,我们假定对象对代理人有优先权,对受稳定制约的几套概率分配办法适用VER。当优先事项是平坦的,而代理人在优惠和优先事项严格时提出威慑性推迟接受的算法时,VER与(超常)概率序列规则相吻合。虽然VER的结果总是反映稳定和受限制的有效分配办法,但是它没有受到战略的制约、不受限制的效率和嫉妒性。然而,我们表明这三种财产中的每一项都与稳定性和有效性不相容。