We develop an auction model for digital advertising. A monopoly platform has access to data on the value of the match between advertisers and consumers. The platform support bidding with additional information and increase the feasible surplus for on-platform matches. Advertisers jointly determine their pricing strategy both on and off the platform, as well as their bidding for digital advertising on the platform. We compare a data-augmented second-price auction and a managed campaign mechanism. In the data-augmented auction, the bids by the advertisers are informed by the data of the platform regarding the value of the match. This results in a socially efficient allocation on the platform, but the advertisers increase their product prices off the platform to be more competitive on the platform. In consequence, the allocation off the platform is inefficient due to excessively high product prices. The managed campaign mechanism allows advertisers to submit budgets that are then transformed into matches and prices through an autobidding algorithm. Compared to the data-augmented second-price auction, the optimal managed campaign mechanism increases the revenue of the digital platform. The product prices off the platform increase and the consumer surplus decreases.
翻译:我们开发了数字广告的拍卖模型。垄断平台可以访问关于广告商和消费者之间匹配价值的数据。该平台支持带有额外信息的竞标,并增加了在平台上的匹配的可行余额。广告商共同确定他们在平台上和平台外的定价策略,以及他们在平台上进行数字广告竞标。我们比较了数据增强的第二价格拍卖和托管活动机制。在数据增强的拍卖中,广告商的竞标受到平台关于匹配价值的数据影响。这导致平台上的社会有效分配,但广告商会提高平台外的产品价格以在平台上更有竞争力。因此,平台外的分配效率低下,由于产品价格过高。托管活动机制允许广告商提交预算,然后通过自动竞标算法将其转换为匹配和价格。与数据增强的第二价格拍卖相比,最优托管活动机制增加了数字平台的收入。平台外的产品价格上涨,而消费者剩余减少。