Research in artificial intelligence (AI) for social good presupposes some definition of social good, but potential definitions have been seldom suggested and never agreed upon. The normative question of what AI for social good research should be "for" is not thoughtfully elaborated, or is frequently addressed with a utilitarian outlook that prioritizes the needs of the majority over those who have been historically marginalized, brushing aside realities of injustice and inequity. We argue that AI for social good ought to be assessed by the communities that the AI system will impact, using as a guide the capabilities approach, a framework to measure the ability of different policies to improve human welfare equity. Furthermore, we lay out how AI research has the potential to catalyze social progress by expanding and equalizing capabilities. We show how the capabilities approach aligns with a participatory approach for the design and implementation of AI for social good research in a framework we introduce called PACT, in which community members affected should be brought in as partners and their input prioritized throughout the project. We conclude by providing an incomplete set of guiding questions for carrying out such participatory AI research in a way that elicits and respects a community's own definition of social good.
翻译:人工智能(AI)研究社会公益(AI)的前提是对社会公益作某种定义,但很少提出可能的定义,也从未就此达成一致。关于什么是AI应该“为”社会公益研究的规范性问题,没有经过深思熟虑的阐述,或经常以实用主义观点加以解决,将大多数人的需要放在优先于历史上被边缘化的人之上,而忽视不公正和不平等的现实。我们主张,社区应该评估AI促进社会福祉的大赦国际,认为该学会系统将以能力方法为指南,对衡量不同政策提高人类福利平等的能力的框架产生影响。此外,我们阐述了AI研究如何通过扩大和平衡能力促进社会进步的潜力。我们展示了在我们采用的称为PACT的框架内,设计和实施AI促进社会公益研究的能力方法如何与参与性方法相一致,在这个框架内,受影响的社区成员应作为伙伴参与进来,他们的投入在整个项目中得到优先考虑。我们通过提供一套不完整的指导性问题来指导如何开展这种参与性的AI研究,从而了解和尊重社区自己对社会公益的定义。