Agriculture is facing a labor crisis, leading to increased interest in fleets of small, under-canopy robots (agbots) that can perform precise, targeted actions (e.g., crop scouting, weeding, fertilization), while being supervised by human operators remotely. However, farmers are not necessarily experts in robotics technology and will not adopt technologies that add to their workload or do not provide an immediate payoff. In this work, we explore methods for communication between a remote human operator and multiple agbots and examine the impact of audio communication on the operator's preferences and productivity. We develop a simulation platform where agbots are deployed across a field, randomly encounter failures, and call for help from the operator. As the agbots report errors, various audio communication mechanisms are tested to convey which robot failed and what type of failure occurs. The human is tasked with verbally diagnosing the failure while completing a secondary task. A user study was conducted to test three audio communication methods: earcons, single-phrase commands, and full sentence communication. Each participant completed a survey to determine their preferences and each method's overall effectiveness. Our results suggest that the system using single phrases is the most positively perceived by participants and may allow for the human to complete the secondary task more efficiently. The code is available at: https://github.com/akamboj2/Agbot-Sim.
翻译:农业正面临一场劳工危机,导致对小型、低冠状机器人(Agbots)车队的兴趣增加,这些机队在由人类操作者远程监督的情况下,可以采取精确和有针对性的行动(如作物侦察、杂草、肥沃等),但农民不一定是机器人技术的专家,也不会采用增加工作量或不提供即时报酬的技术。在这项工作中,我们探索了远程人类操作者与多个机器人之间的沟通方法,并研究了音频通信对操作者的喜好和生产力的影响。我们开发了一个模拟平台,在现场布置了方格机器人,随机遭遇失败,并请求操作者提供帮助。在Agbots报告错误时,对各种音频通信机制进行了测试,以传达机器人失败的原因和失败的发生类型。在完成一项次级任务时,人类的任务是口头分析失败情况。进行了一项用户研究,以测试三种音频通信方法:耳con、单句指令和句子通信的影响。每个参与者都完成了一项调查,以确定其偏好的选择,而每种方法都允许进行。