With the increasing scale, complexity, and heterogeneity of the next generation networked systems, seamless control, management, and security of such systems becomes increasingly challenging. Many diverse applications have driven interest in networked systems, including large-scale distributed learning, multi-agent optimization, 5G service provisioning, and network slicing, etc. In this paper, we propose trust as a measure to evaluate the status of network agents and improve the decision-making process. We interpret trust as a relation among entities that participate in various protocols. Trust relations are based on evidence created by the interactions of entities within a protocol and may be a composite of multiple metrics such as availability, reliability, resilience, etc. depending on application context. We first elaborate on the importance of trust as a metric and then present a mathematical framework for trust computation and aggregation within a network. Then we show in practice, how trust can be integrated into network decision-making processes by presenting two examples. In the first example, we show how utilizing the trust evidence can improve the performance and the security of Federated Learning. Second, we show how a 5G network resource provisioning framework can be improved when augmented with a trust-aware decision-making scheme. We verify the validity of our trust-based approach through simulations. Finally, we explain the challenges associated with aggregating the trust evidence and briefly explain our ideas to tackle them.
翻译:随着下一代网络化系统的规模、复杂性和多样性的日益扩大、复杂性和多样性,这种系统的无缝控制、管理和安全越来越具有挑战性。许多不同的应用已经激发了对网络化系统的兴趣,包括大规模分布式学习、多试剂优化、5G服务提供和网络切除等。在本文件中,我们提议信任作为评价网络代理者状况和改进决策过程的一项措施。我们把信任解释为参与各种协议的实体之间的关系。信任关系基于协议内实体互动产生的证据,并且可能是多种指标的组合,例如可用性、可靠性、复原力等等。我们首先阐述信任作为衡量标准的重要性,然后提出网络内信任计算和汇总的数学框架。然后,我们在实践中展示信任如何通过两个例子纳入网络决策进程。我们首先展示信任证据如何利用信任证据来改进联邦学习的业绩和安全。第二,我们展示了5G网络资源提供框架如何在改进时,最终通过信任机制来解释我们的信任-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-和主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-和主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-和主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-主权-