"Bibliometrics", "scientometrics", "informetrics", and "webometrics" can all be considered as manifestations of a single research area with similar objectives and methods, which we call "information metrics" or iMetrics. This study explores the cognitive and social distinctness of iMetrics with respect to the general information science (IS), focusing on a core of researchers, shared vocabulary and literature/knowledge base. Our analysis investigates the similarities and differences between four document sets. The document sets are drawn from three core journals for iMetrics research (Scientometrics, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, and Journal of Informetrics). We split JASIST into document sets containing iMetrics and general IS articles. The volume of publications in this representation of the specialty has increased rapidly during the last decade. A core of researchers that predominantly focus on iMetrics topics can thus be identified. This core group has developed a shared vocabulary as exhibited in high similarity of title words and one that shares a knowledge base. The research front of this field moves faster than the research front of information science in general, bringing it closer to Price's dream.
翻译:“生物量度”、“科学计量学”、“科学计量学”、“测量学”和“测量学”都可被视为具有类似目标和方法的单一研究领域的表现形式,我们称之为“信息量度”或“计量学”。本研究探讨了IMetrics在一般信息科学(IS)方面的认知和社会特性,侧重于研究人员的核心、共享词汇和文献/知识基础。我们的分析调查了四套文件之间的异同。文件集取自三个核心期刊,用于iMetrics研究(科学测量学、美国信息科技学会杂志和计量学期刊)。我们把JASISISIST分成了一组文件,其中载有iMetrics和一般IS文章。在过去十年中,该专业出版物的数量迅速增加。一个主要侧重于iMetricrics专题的研究人员核心。这个核心组开发了一个以非常相似的标题词展示的共同词汇,一个分享知识基础的词汇。这个领域的研究领域,其前方比研究面更接近Iprice's Gregilleral as.