The volume of discussions concerning brands within social media provides digital marketers with great opportunities for tracking and analyzing the feelings and views of consumers toward brands, products, influencers, services, and ad campaigns in CGC. The present study aims to assess and compare the performance of firms and celebrities (i.e., influencers that with the experience of being in an ad campaign of those companies) with the automated sentiment analysis that was employed for CGC at social media while exploring the feeling of the consumers toward them to observe which influencer (of two for each company) had a closer effect with the corresponding corporation on consumer minds. For this purpose, several consumer tweets from the pages of brands and influencers were utilized to make a comparison of machine learning and lexicon-based approaches to the sentiment analysis through the Naive algorithm (lexicon-based) and Naive Bayes algorithm (machine learning method) and obtain the desired results to assess the campaigns. The findings suggested that the approaches were dissimilar in terms of accuracy; the machine learning method yielded higher accuracy. Finally, the results showed which influencer was more appropriate according to their existence in previous campaigns and helped choose the right influencer in the future for our company and have a better, more appropriate, and more efficient ad campaign subsequently. It is required to conduct further studies on the accuracy improvement of the sentiment classification. This approach should be employed for other social media CGC types. The results revealed decision-making for which sentiment analysis methods are the best approaches for the analysis of social media. It was also found that companies should be aware of their consumers' sentiments and choose the right person every time they think of a campaign.
翻译:有关社交媒体品牌的讨论数量之多,为数字市场提供了极好的机会,以跟踪和分析消费者对CGC品牌、产品、影响者、服务和广告运动的感情和观点。本研究报告旨在评估和比较公司和名人(即具有参与这些公司广告运动经验的影响力者)的业绩和社交媒体对CGC的自动情绪分析,同时探索消费者对消费者的看法,以观察哪些影响者(每家公司有两家)对消费者思想产生更密切的影响。为此,利用了品牌和影响力公司网页上的几篇消费者媒体推文,对机器学习和基于词汇的方法与通过Naive算法(基于弹性算法)和Nive Bayes算法(机械学习方法)进行情绪分析,并获得评估运动的预期结果。研究结果表明,在准确性方面,消费者的方法不同;机器学习方法具有更高的准确性。最后,结果显示,影响者根据其在以往的竞选运动和影响力所在的网页上的存在更为恰当。帮助选择机器学习和基于词汇的词汇分析方法,随后对公司进行更准确性的分析。在社会运动中进行更准确性分析时,应该更准确地分析。在公司进行更好的社会运动分析。应该更准确地分析。在将来进行这种分析。应该更准确地分析。在社会运动中更准确地分析。应该更准确地分析。