National culture is among those societal factors which could influence research and innovation activities. In this study, we investigated the associations of two national culture models with citation impact of nations (measured by the proportion of papers belonging to the 10% and 1% most cited papers in the corresponding fields, PPtop 10% and PPtop 1%). Bivariate statistical analyses showed that of six Hofstede's national culture dimensions (HNCD), uncertainty avoidance and power distance had a statistically significant negative associa-tion, while individualism and indulgence had a statistically significant positive associationwith both citation impact indicators. The study also revealed that of two Inglehart-Welzel cultural values (IWCV), the value survival versus self-expression is statistically significantly related to citation impact indicators. We additionally calculated multiple regression analyses controlling for the possible effects of confounding factors including national self-citations, international co-authorships, invest-ments in research and development, international migrant stock, number of researchers ofeach nation, language, and productivity. The results revealed that the statistically significant associations of HNCD with citation impact indicators disappeared. But the statistically significant relationship between survivals versus self-expression values and citation impact indicators remained stable even after controlling for the confounding variables. Thus, the freedom of expression and trust in society might contribute to better scholarly communication systems, higher level of international collaborations, and further quality research.
翻译:在这项研究中,我们调查了两种民族文化模式的关联,这些模式具有国家引证影响(以占相应领域的10%和1%最引证论文的比例、PPtop 10%和Pptop 1%的比例衡量),双轨统计分析表明,包括国家文化的六个民族文化层面(HNCD),避免不确定性和权力距离具有统计上显著的负面影响,而个人主义和宽容与两个引证影响指标在统计上都有着显著的积极联系。研究还显示,两种Inglehart-Welzel文化价值(IWCV)的文献在统计上占10%和1%的比例,其价值与自我表达在统计影响指标方面有很大的关系。我们另外还计算了多重回归分析,以控制混杂因素可能产生的影响,包括国家自引、国际共同授权、研发系统投资、国际移民总量、各国研究人员数量、语言和生产力。研究结果显示,HNCMC的统计上较高级别协会与研究指标之间的较高联系,从而稳定地控制了统计数据和可持续性。但是,在统计上保持了较稳定的社会之间的对比关系。