A large number of survey papers are being published in blockchain since the first survey appeared in 2017. A person entering into the field of blockchain is faced with the issue of which blockchain surveys to read and why? Who is publishing these surveys and what is the nature of these surveys? Which of the publishers are publishing more such surveys and what are the lengths of the published surveys? Which kind of survey is getting more citations? Which of the authors is collaborating on such surveys? etc. All these questions motivated us to analyze the trends in publishing blockchain surveys. In this paper, we have performed a bibliometric analysis on $801$ surveys or review papers published in the field of blockchain in the last approximately five years. We have analyzed the papers with respect to the publication type, publishers and venue, references, citations, paper length, different categories, year, countries, authors, and their collaborations and found interesting insights. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first of its kind and hope to provide better understanding of the field.
翻译:自2017年第一次调查以来,大量调查论文正在编成块链中发表。进入块链领域的人面临一个问题,即要读到哪个块链调查以及为什么?谁在出版这些调查以及这些调查的性质是什么?哪些出版商正在出版更多的这类调查以及所出版的调查的长度是什么?哪些调查得到更多的引用?哪些调查得到更多的引用?哪些作者正在合作进行这种调查?等等。所有这些问题促使我们分析出版块链调查的趋势。在本文中,我们对在块链领域出版的801美元调查或审查文件进行了二元分析,在过去五年中,我们分析了有关出版物类型、出版商和地点、参考资料、引文、纸张长度、不同类别、年份、国家、作者及其协作和发现有趣见解的论文。我们最了解的是,这一研究是其类型中的第一件,希望对这个领域有更好的了解。