Local Policy Improvement for Recommender Systems

Recommender systems aim to answer the following question: given the items that a user has interacted with, what items will this user likely interact with next? Historically this problem is often framed as a predictive task via (self-)supervised learning. In recent years, we have seen more emphasis placed on approaching the recommendation problem from a policy optimization perspective: learning a policy that maximizes some reward function (e.g., user engagement). However, it is commonly the case in recommender systems that we are only able to train a new policy given data collected from a previously-deployed policy. The conventional way to address such a policy mismatch is through importance sampling correction, which unfortunately comes with its own limitations. In this paper, we suggest an alternative approach, which involves the use of local policy improvement without off-policy correction. Drawing from a number of related results in the fields of causal inference, bandits, and reinforcement learning, we present a suite of methods that compute and optimize a lower bound of the expected reward of the target policy. Crucially, this lower bound is a function that is easy to estimate from data, and which does not involve density ratios (such as those appearing in importance sampling correction). We argue that this local policy improvement paradigm is particularly well suited for recommender systems, given that in practice the previously-deployed policy is typically of reasonably high quality, and furthermore it tends to be re-trained frequently and gets continuously updated. We discuss some practical recipes on how to apply some of the proposed techniques in a sequential recommendation setting.