As mobile health (mHealth) studies become increasingly productive due to the advancements in wearable and mobile sensor technology, our ability to monitor and model human behavior will be constrained by participant receptivity. Many health constructs are dependent on subjective responses, and without such responses, researchers are left with little to no ground truth to accompany our ever-growing biobehavioral data. We examine the factors that affect participants' responsiveness to ecological momentary assessments (EMA) in a 10 day wearable and EMA based affect sensing mHealth study. We study the physiological relationships indicative of receptivity and affect while also analyzing the interaction between the two constructs. We collected the data from 45 healthy participants wearing two devices measuring electrodermal activity, acceleration, electrocardiography, and skin temperature while answering 10 EMAs a day containing questions related to perceived mood. Due to the nature of our constructs, we can only obtain ground truth measures for both affect and receptivity during a response. Therefore, we utilized unsupervised and supervised learning methods to infer affect when a participant did not respond. Based on our findings we showed that using a receptivity model to trigger EMAs will decrease the reported negative affect by more than 3 points or 0.29 standard deviation using our psychological instrument scored between 13 and 91. The findings also showed a bimodal distribution of our predicted affect during nonresponses. Our results showed a clear relationship between affect and receptivity. This relationship can affect the efficacy of a mHealth study, particularly those studies that employ a learning algorithm to trigger EMAs. Therefore, we propose a smart trigger that promotes EMA and JITI receptivity without influencing affect during sampled time points as future work.
翻译:随着可穿戴和移动传感器技术的进步,移动健康(mHealth)研究变得越来越高效,我们监测和建模人类行为的能力将受到参与者情感感知的限制。许多健康构建依赖于主观响应,如果没有这些响应,研究人员将几乎没有任何基准来解释人类生理行为数据。我们研究在一个为期10天的可穿戴物和基于EMA的情感感知mHealth研究中影响参与者响应可生态瞬时评估(EMA)的因素。我们研究了表明情感感知和情感的生理关系,同时分析了两个构建之间的交互作用。我们收集了45名健康参与者的数据,他们佩戴了两个装置,测量电皮层活动、加速度、电心图和皮肤温度,同时回答每天10个涉及感知情绪的EMA问题。由于我们构建的特性,我们只能在回答EMA问题时获得感知和情感的基准测量。因此,我们使用无监督和监督学习方法来推断出参与者未作出响应时的情感。基于我们的研究发现,我们表明使用感知模型来触发EMA将减少报告的负面情感超过3个点或0.29个标准偏差,使用我们的心理工具,评分介于13和91之间。研究结果还显示了非响应期间预测情感的双峰分布。我们的结论显示情感和情感感知之间存在明显的关系。这种关系可能会影响mHealth研究的效果,特别是那些采用学习算法触发EMA的研究。因此,我们提出了一个智能触发器,促进EMA和JITI感知,而不会在样本时间点上影响情感,在未来的工作中可以优化这个触发器。