Social media has become extremely influential when it comes to policy making in modern societies, especially in the western world, where platforms such as Twitter allow users to follow politicians, thus making citizens more involved in political discussion. In the same vein, politicians use Twitter to express their opinions, debate among others on current topics and promote their political agendas aiming to influence voter behaviour. In this paper, we attempt to analyse tweets of politicians from three European countries and explore the virality of their tweets. Previous studies have shown that tweets conveying negative sentiment are likely to be retweeted more frequently. By utilising state-of-the-art pre-trained language models, we performed sentiment analysis on hundreds of thousands of tweets collected from members of parliament in Greece, Spain and the United Kingdom, including devolved administrations. We achieved this by systematically exploring and analysing the differences between influential and less popular tweets. Our analysis indicates that politicians' negatively charged tweets spread more widely, especially in more recent times, and highlights interesting differences between political parties as well as between politicians and the general population.
翻译:社交媒体已成为现代社会政策制定中非常有影响力的因素,特别是在西方世界,Twitter等平台让用户关注政治家,从而使公民更加参与政治讨论。同样,政治家们也利用Twitter表达他们的意见,在当前话题上与其他人进行辩论,并推动他们的政治议程,旨在影响选民的行为。在本文中,我们试图分析来自三个欧洲国家政治家的推文,探索其推文的病毒性。之前的研究表明,传达负面情感的推文更容易被转发。通过利用最先进的预训练语言模型,我们对从希腊、西班牙和英国(包括分权行政机构的成员)收集的数十万条推文进行情感分析。我们通过系统性地探索和分析有影响力和不那么流行的推文之间的差异来实现这一点。我们的分析表明,政治家们负面情绪的推文更广泛传播,尤其是在更近期,还突出了政党之间以及政治家和一般民众之间的有趣差异。