This paper reports an interview study about how consent to sexual activity is computer-mediated. The study's context of online dating is chosen due to the prevalence of sexual violence, or nonconsensual sexual activity, that is associated with dating app-use. Participants (n=19) represent a range of gender identities and sexual orientations, and predominantly used the dating app Tinder. Findings reveal two computer-mediated consent processes: consent signaling and affirmative consent. With consent signaling, users employed Tinder's interface to infer and imply agreement to sex without any explicit confirmation before making sexual advances in-person. With affirmative consent, users employed the interface to establish patterns of overt discourse around sex and consent across online and offline modalities. The paper elucidates shortcomings of both computer-mediated consent processes that leave users susceptible to sexual violence and envisions dating apps as potential sexual violence prevention solutions if deliberately designed to mediate consent exchange.
翻译:本文报告了关于同意性活动如何以计算机为中介的访谈研究,选择在线约会的背景是因为性暴力的普遍程度,或与约会应用程序有关的非自愿性活动。参与者(n=19)代表一系列性别认同和性取向,并主要使用约会助理Tinder。研究结果揭示了两种计算机中介同意程序:同意信号和肯定同意。在同意信号下,用户利用Tinder的界面在未经任何明确确认的情况下推断和暗示同意性活动,然后才能亲自作出性进展。在肯定同意的情况下,用户利用该界面来建立围绕性以及在线和离线模式之间同意性公开交谈的模式。该文件阐述了计算机中介同意程序的缺陷,使用户容易遭受性暴力,并设想如果故意设计用于调解同意交流,约会应用程序作为潜在的性暴力预防解决方案。