Postal voting is growing rapidly in the U.S., with 43% of voters casting ballots by mail in 2020, yet until recently there has been little research about extending the protections of end-to-end verifiable (E2E-V) election schemes to vote-by-mail contexts. The first - and to date, only - framework to focus on this setting is STROBE, which has important usability limitations. In this work, we present two approaches, RemoteVote and SAFE Vote, that allow mail-in voters to benefit from E2E-V without changing the voter experience for those who choose not to participate in verification. To evaluate these systems and compare them with STROBE, we consider an expansive set of properties, including novel attributes of usability and verifiability, several of which have applicability beyond vote-by-mail contexts. We hope that our work will help catalyze further progress towards universal applicability of E2E-V for real-world elections.
翻译:在美国,43%的选民在2020年通过邮件投票,邮政投票迅速增长,2020年有43%的选民通过邮件投票,然而,直到最近为止,对于扩大对端对端可核查(E2E-V)选举计划的保护范围,将逐个邮件投票的情况扩大到保护问题的研究很少。关于这一背景,第一个――迄今为止,唯一关注这个问题的框架是STROBE, 它具有重要的可用性限制。在这项工作中,我们提出了两种方法,即远程投票和安全投票,允许邮递选民从E2E-V中受益,同时不改变选择不参加核查的人的选民经验。为了评估这些系统并与STROBE进行比较,我们考虑扩大一套财产,包括新的可用性和可核查性特征,其中若干特性的适用性超越了逐个投票的背景。我们希望我们的工作将有助于进一步推动E2E-V在现实世界选举中的普遍适用性。