The ability of a model to learn continually can be empirically assessed in different continual learning scenarios. Each scenario defines the constraints and the opportunities of the learning environment. Here, we challenge the current trend in the continual learning literature to experiment mainly on class-incremental scenarios, where classes present in one experience are never revisited. We posit that an excessive focus on this setting may be limiting for future research on continual learning, since class-incremental scenarios artificially exacerbate catastrophic forgetting, at the expense of other important objectives like forward transfer and computational efficiency. In many real-world environments, in fact, repetition of previously encountered concepts occurs naturally and contributes to softening the disruption of previous knowledge. We advocate for a more in-depth study of alternative continual learning scenarios, in which repetition is integrated by design in the stream of incoming information. Starting from already existing proposals, we describe the advantages such class-incremental with repetition scenarios could offer for a more comprehensive assessment of continual learning models.
翻译:在不同的连续学习情景中,可以以经验方式评估持续学习模式的能力。每种情景都界定了学习环境的制约因素和机会。在这里,我们挑战持续学习文献的当前趋势,主要在课堂入门情景上进行实验,在这类情景中,一个经历中的班级从未被重新讨论过。我们假设,过度关注这一环境可能会限制今后对继续学习的研究,因为等级入门情景人为地加剧灾难性的遗忘,而牺牲了其他重要目标,如远期转移和计算效率。事实上,在许多现实世界环境中,过去遇到的概念的重复自然发生,有助于减轻对以往知识的破坏。我们主张更深入地研究替代的继续学习情景,通过设计将重复纳入信息流中。我们从现有的提案出发,描述这种与重复情景相适应的阶级入门情景可以为更全面地评估持续学习模式提供的好处。