The relationships between eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a product graph and those of its factor graphs have been known for the standard products, while characterization of Laplacian eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the Kronecker product of graphs using the Laplacian spectra and eigenvectors of the factors turned out to be quite challenging and has remained an open problem to date. Several approaches for the estimation of Laplacian spectrum of the Kronecker product of graphs have been proposed in recent years. However, it turns out that not all the methods are practical to apply in network science models, particularly in the context of multilayer networks. Here we develop a practical and computationally efficient method to estimate Laplacian spectra of this graph product from spectral properties of their factor graphs which is more stable than the alternatives proposed in the literature. We emphasize that a median of the percentage errors of our estimated Laplacian spectrum almost coincides with the $x$-axis, unlike the alternatives which have sudden jumps at the beginning followed by a gradual decrease for the percentage errors. The percentage errors confined (confidence of the estimations) up to $\pm$10% for all considered approximations, depending on a graph density. Moreover, we theoretically prove that the percentage errors becomes smaller when the network grows or the edge density level increases. Additionally, some novel theoretical results considering the exact formulas and lower bounds related to the certain correlation coefficients corresponding to the estimated eigenvectors are presented.
翻译:产品图的epegenvalue 和 epegenvictors 之间的关系,以及产品图的 eplacian 和 egenvisors 之间的关系,在标准产品中是已知的,而对于Laplacian egenvalies 和 Kronecker 的图形,在使用 Laplacian 光谱和 egenvectors 的图形中,这些要素的epegenvals 和 eigenvictors 之间的关系,事实证明,对于标准产品来说,并不是所有方法都适用于网络的Laplacian egenvalies 和 epegenvictors, 特别是多层网络背景下的Laplacian egenvalies 和 epegenctors 。在这里,我们开发了一种实用和计算高效的方法,根据这些图形的光谱特性来估计,这些光谱值比文献中提议的替代品更具有挑战性。我们估计的Laplaplacecian 频谱的中, 与 $- 轴 轴值几乎与 轴值一致。 但是 。 但, 与开始的替代品不同,这些方法在开始跳跃升的直值中, 10 直值上, 直值值值的值为递增的精确度水平上, 当我们所考虑的精确度值的精确度值的精确度会增加一个百分比的精确度, 。