We study international mobility in academia, with a focus on the migration of published researchers to and from Russia. Using an exhaustive set of over $2.4$ million Scopus publications, we analyze all researchers who have published with a Russian affiliation address in Scopus-indexed sources in 1996-2020. The migration of researchers is observed through the changes in their affiliation addresses, which altered their mode countries of affiliation across different years. While only $5.2\%$ of these researchers were internationally mobile, they accounted for a substantial proportion of citations. Our estimates of net migration rates indicate that while Russia was a donor country in the late 1990s and early 2000s, it has experienced a relatively balanced circulation of researchers in more recent years. These findings suggest that the current trends in scholarly migration in Russia could be better framed as brain circulation, rather than as brain drain. Overall, researchers emigrating from Russia outnumbered and outperformed researchers immigrating to Russia. Our analysis on the subject categories of publication venues shows that in the past 25 years, Russia has, overall, suffered a net loss in most disciplines, and most notably in the five disciplines of neuroscience, decision sciences, mathematics, biochemistry, and pharmacology. We demonstrate the robustness of our main findings under random exclusion of data and changes in numeric parameters. Our substantive results shed light on new aspects of international mobility in academia, and on the impact of this mobility on a national science system, which have direct implications for policy development. Methodologically, our novel approach to handling big data can be adopted as a framework of analysis for studying scholarly migration in other countries.
翻译:我们研究学术界的国际流动性,重点是出版的研究人员与俄罗斯之间的移徙。我们利用一套240万美元以上的Scopus出版物的详尽资料,分析了所有研究人员在1996-2020年的Scopus索引来源中以俄罗斯附属地址发表论文的所有研究人员。研究人员的移徙是通过其附属地址的变化观察的,这种变化在不同年份改变了其联系模式国家。虽然这些研究人员中只有5.2美元是国际流动的,但占引文的很大一部分。我们对净移徙率的估计表明,虽然俄罗斯在1990年代后期和2000年代初是捐助国,但近年来研究人员的流通相对平衡。这些调查结果表明,目前俄罗斯的学术移徙趋势可以更好地以大脑流通而不是人才外流为框架。总体而言,从俄罗斯的研究人员人数超过其所属国家,而且其素质也比研究人员要差得多。我们对出版地点的主题类别的分析表明,在过去25年中,俄罗斯在大多数学科中都遭受了净损失,最明显的是,在神经科学、决策科学、数学、生物化学学和化学学等五个学科中,我们的国家的学术移徙趋势的当前趋势趋势趋势可以更好地被描述为大脑流通,而我们的国际数据流学中的主要变化。