Delegation covers a broad class of problems in which a principal doesn't have the resources or expertise necessary to complete a task by themselves, so they delegate the task to an agent whose interests may not be aligned with their own. Stochastic probing describes problems in which we are tasked with maximizing expected utility by "probing" known distributions for acceptable solutions subject to certain constraints. In this work, we combine the concepts of delegation and stochastic probing into a single mechanism design framework which we term delegated stochastic probing. We study how much a principal loses by delegating a stochastic probing problem, compared to their utility in the non-delegated solution. Our model and results are heavily inspired by the work of Kleinberg and Kleinberg in "Delegated Search Approximates Efficient Search." Building on their work, we show that there exists a connection between delegated stochastic probing and generalized prophet inequalities, which provides us with constant-factor deterministic mechanisms for a large class of delegated stochastic probing problems. We also explore randomized mechanisms in a simple delegated probing setting, and show that they outperform deterministic mechanisms in some instances but not in the worst case.
翻译:代表团涉及广泛的问题, 委托人没有完成某项任务所必需的资源或专门知识, 因此他们将这项任务委托给一个其利益可能与其自身利益不相符的代理人。 斯托克调查描述了我们的任务是通过“ 探究”已知分配办法, 最大限度地发挥预期效用的问题。 在这项工作中, 我们把授权和随机调查的概念合并成一个单一的机制设计框架, 我们用“ 随机调查” 来称呼它, 我们用我们所说的“ 随机调查” 来形容。 我们的研究, 将委托人调查的问题委托给一个可能与自身利益不符的代理人, 从而损失了多少。 我们的模型和结果在很大程度上受到克莱因伯格和克莱因伯格在“ 缩小搜索范围, 提高搜索效率” 中的工作的启发。 在他们的工作基础上, 我们显示, 授权的随机调查与普遍的先知不平等之间存在联系, 为我们提供了一个固定的确定机制, 用于处理大量委托调查的问题。 我们还在最差的验证机制中探索了一些随机机制, 而不是在最差的检验机制中进行随机性研究。