Deep Learning methods have been proven to be flexible to model complex phenomena. This has also been the case of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), in which several areas such as vehicular perception and traffic analysis have widely embraced Deep Learning as a core modeling technology. Particularly in short-term traffic forecasting, the capability of Deep Learning to deliver good results has generated a prevalent inertia towards using Deep Learning models, without examining in depth their benefits and downsides. This paper focuses on critically analyzing the state of the art in what refers to the use of Deep Learning for this particular ITS research area. To this end, we elaborate on the findings distilled from a review of publications from recent years, based on two taxonomic criteria. A posterior critical analysis is held to formulate questions and trigger a necessary debate about the issues of Deep Learning for traffic forecasting. The study is completed with a benchmark of diverse short-term traffic forecasting methods over traffic datasets of different nature, aimed to cover a wide spectrum of possible scenarios. Our experimentation reveals that Deep Learning could not be the best modeling technique for every case, which unveils some caveats unconsidered to date that should be addressed by the community in prospective studies. These insights reveal new challenges and research opportunities in road traffic forecasting, which are enumerated and discussed thoroughly, with the intention of inspiring and guiding future research efforts in this field.
翻译:深度学习方法被证明是模拟复杂现象的灵活方法,智能运输系统(ITS)的情况也是这样,在这个系统中,诸如车辆感知和交通分析等若干领域广泛将深层学习视为核心模型技术。特别是在短期交通预测方面,深层学习提供良好结果的能力在利用深层学习模型方面产生了普遍的惰性,而没有深入研究其好处和下坡面。本文侧重于批判性地分析在这个特定ITS研究领域使用深层学习的先进技术。为此,我们详细阐述了近年来根据两个分类标准对出版物进行的审查所得出的一些结论。我们进行了一项重大分析,以拟订问题和引发关于交通预测深层学习问题的必要辩论。完成这项研究时采用了不同性质的交通数据集的多种短期交通预测方法基准,目的是涵盖各种可能的情况。我们的实验表明深层学习可能不是每个案例的最佳模型技术,每个案例都揭示了一些不深入的洞穴研究结果,根据两个分类标准,揭示了近年的出版物。为了预测未来的道路,这些研究将展示出新的前景,这些前景研究将揭示出新的前景,这些前景研究将揭示出新的前景,在社区研究中加以探讨。