We use "glide charts" (plots of sequences of root mean squared forecast errors as the target date is approached) to evaluate and compare fixed-target forecasts of Arctic sea ice. We first use them to evaluate the simple feature-engineered linear regression (FELR) forecasts of Diebold and Goebel (2021), and to compare FELR forecasts to naive pure-trend benchmark forecasts. Then we introduce a much more sophisticated feature-engineered machine learning (FEML) model, and we use glide charts to evaluate FEML forecasts and compare them to a FELR benchmark. Our substantive results include the frequent appearance of predictability thresholds, which differ across months, meaning that accuracy initially fails to improve as the target date is approached but then increases progressively once a threshold lead time is crossed. Also, we find that FEML can improve appreciably over FELR when forecasting "turning point" months in the annual cycle at horizons of one to three months ahead.
翻译:我们用“滑翔图”来评估和比较北极海冰的固定目标预测。我们首先利用这些图来评估Diebold和Goebel(2021年)的简单地貌设计线性回归(FELR)预测,并将FELR预测与天真的纯趋势基准预测进行比较。然后我们采用一个更先进的地貌设计机器学习模型(FEML)模型,然后我们用滑翔图来评价FEML预测,并将其与FELR基准进行比较。我们的实质性结果包括经常出现可预测性阈值,这些阈值在几个月之间各不相同,这意味着随着目标日期的接近,准确性最初没有改进,但一旦一个临界时间跨过,就会逐渐提高。此外,我们发现FEML在预测一年周期的1至3个月的地平线时,在FELR的“转折点”月数上可以大大改进FELR。