Global Software Engineering (GSE) research contains few examples consciously applying what Glass and colleagues have termed an 'evaluative-critical' approach. In this study we apply dilemma analysis to conduct a critical review of a major (and ongoing) nearshore Business Process Outsourcing project in New Zealand. The project has become so troubled that a Government Minister has recently been assigned responsibility for troubleshooting it. The 'Novopay' project concerns the implementation of a nationwide payroll system responsible for the payment of some 110,000 teachers and education sector staff. An Australian company won the contract for customizing and implementing the Novopay system, taking over from an existing New Zealand service provider. We demonstrate how a modified form of dilemma analysis can be a powerful technique for highlighting risks and stakeholder impacts from empirical data, and that adopting an evaluative-critical approach to such projects can usefully highlight tensions and barriers to satisfactory project outcomes.
翻译:全球软件工程(GSE)研究中,没有几个有意识地应用格拉斯和同事称之为“评估-关键”方法的例子。在本研究中,我们运用进退两难分析对新西兰一个重大(和正在进行的)近岸业务流程外包项目进行批判性审查。该项目已经变得非常麻烦,政府部长最近被指派负责解决问题。“Novopay”项目涉及实施一个全国工资单系统,负责支付大约110 000名教师和教育部门工作人员。一家澳大利亚公司赢得了定制和实施Novopopay系统的合同,接管了现有的新西兰服务提供商。我们展示了一种经过修改的进退两难分析形式如何成为强调经验数据的风险和利益攸关方影响的有力技术,而且对这些项目采取评价批评性做法可以有益地突出紧张和妨碍项目取得令人满意的结果的障碍。