Emergent communication protocols among humans and artificial neural network agents do not yet share the same properties and show some critical mismatches in results. We describe three important phenomena with respect to the emergence and benefits of compositionality: ease-of-learning, generalization, and group size effects (i.e., larger groups create more systematic languages). The latter two are not fully replicated with neural agents, which hinders the use of neural emergent communication for language evolution research. We argue that one possible reason for these mismatches is that key cognitive and communicative constraints of humans are not yet integrated. Specifically, in humans, memory constraints and the alternation between the roles of speaker and listener underlie the emergence of linguistic structure, yet these constraints are typically absent in neural simulations. We suggest that introducing such communicative and cognitive constraints would promote more linguistically plausible behaviors with neural agents.
翻译:人类和人工神经网络代理器之间新出现的通信协议尚未具有相同的特性,并显示出一些关键的不匹配结果。我们描述了关于组成性出现和好处的三个重要现象:学习的便利、一般化和群体规模效应(即较大群体创造更系统的语言)。后两个没有与神经代理器完全复制,这妨碍了将神经突发通信用于语言演变研究。我们争辩说,这些不匹配的一个可能原因是人类关键的认知和通信限制尚未融合。具体地说,在人类中,语言结构的出现背后是记忆限制以及演讲者和听众角色的改变,但这些限制通常是在神经模拟中不存在的。我们建议,引入这种交流和认知限制将会促进与神经代理器在语言上更合理的行为。