In the early $20^{th}$ century, Pigou observed that imposing a marginal cost tax on the usage of a public good induces a socially efficient level of use as an equilibrium. Unfortunately, such a "Pigouvian" tax may also induce other, socially inefficient, equilibria. We observe that this social inefficiency may be unbounded, and study whether alternative tax structures may lead to milder losses in the worst case, i.e. to a lower price of anarchy. We show that no tax structure leads to bounded losses in the worst case. However, we do find a tax scheme that has a lower price of anarchy than the Pigouvian tax, obtaining tight lower and upper bounds in terms of a crucial parameter that we identify. We generalize our results to various scenarios that each offers an alternative to the use of a public road by private cars, such as ride sharing, or using a bus or a train.
翻译:Pigou指出,在二十世纪初20美元时,对使用公益物征收边际成本税可以导致社会高效的使用水平,作为一种平衡。 不幸的是,这种“皮古维”税还可能导致其他社会效率低下、社会平衡。 我们发现,这种社会效率低下的现象可能没有限制,并研究替代性税收结构是否会导致最糟糕的情况中更温和的损失,即导致无政府状态的价格下降。我们发现,在最坏的情况下,没有任何税收结构会导致约束性损失。然而,我们确实发现,税收结构的无政府状态价格比Pigouvian税低,从我们确定的关键参数来看,获得紧要的下限和上限。我们把结果概括到不同的情景中,每一种情况都为私人汽车使用公共道路提供了替代方法,比如搭乘汽车,或使用公共汽车或火车。