To improve user experience, Alexa now allows users to consent to data sharing via voice rather than directing them to the companion smartphone app. While verbal consent mechanisms for voice assistants (VAs) can increase usability, they can also undermine principles core to informed consent. We conducted a Delphi study with experts from academia, industry, and the public sector on requirements for verbal consent in VAs. Candidate requirements were drawn from the literature, regulations, and research ethics guidelines that participants rated based on their relevance to the consent process, actionability by platforms, and usability by end-users, discussing their reasoning as the study progressed. We highlight key areas of (dis)agreement between experts, deriving recommendations for regulators, skill developers, and VA platforms towards crafting meaningful verbal consent mechanisms. Key themes include approaching permissions according to the user's ability to opt-out, minimising consent decisions, and ensuring platforms follow established consent principles.
翻译:为了改进用户经验,Alexa现在允许用户同意通过语音分享数据,而不是将数据引导到相伴的智能电话应用程序。虽然语音助理口头同意机制可以提高可用性,但也可能损害知情同意的核心原则。我们与学术界、业界和公共部门的专家就自愿同意的口头同意要求进行了德尔斐研究。候选人的要求来自文献、条例和研究道德准则,根据参与者根据与同意过程的相关性、平台可操作性以及最终用户的可用性评定的道德准则,讨论他们随着研究的进展而提出的推理。我们强调了专家之间(分歧)分歧的关键领域,为监管者、技能开发者和自愿同意平台提出建议,以制定有意义的口头同意机制。关键主题包括根据用户选择退出的能力获得许可,尽量减少同意决定,以及确保平台遵守既定的同意原则。