In observational studies, the observed association between an exposure and outcome of interest may be distorted by unobserved confounding. Causal sensitivity analysis can be used to assess the robustness of observed associations to potential unobserved confounding. For time-to-event outcomes, existing sensitivity analysis methods rely on parametric assumptions on the structure of the unobserved confounders and Cox proportional hazards models for the outcome regression. If these assumptions fail to hold, it is unclear whether the conclusions of the sensitivity analysis remain valid. Additionally, causal interpretation of the hazard ratio is challenging. To address these limitations, in this paper we develop a nonparametric sensitivity analysis framework for time-to-event data. Specifically, we derive nonparametric bounds for the difference between the observed and counterfactual survival curves and propose estimators and inference for these bounds using semiparametric efficiency theory. We also provide nonparametric bounds and inference for the difference between the observed and counterfactual restricted mean survival times. We demonstrate the performance of our proposed methods using numerical studies and an analysis of the causal effect of elective neck dissection on mortality in patients with high-grade parotid carcinoma.
翻译:在观察性研究中,暴露与关注结局之间的观测关联可能受到未观测混杂因素的扭曲。因果敏感性分析可用于评估观测关联对潜在未观测混杂因素的稳健性。对于时间至事件结局,现有的敏感性分析方法依赖于对未观测混杂因素结构的参数假设以及结局回归的Cox比例风险模型。若这些假设不成立,敏感性分析的结论是否仍然有效尚不明确。此外,风险比的因果解释具有挑战性。为解决这些局限性,本文针对时间至事件数据开发了一种非参数敏感性分析框架。具体而言,我们推导了观测生存曲线与反事实生存曲线之间差异的非参数界,并基于半参数效率理论提出了这些界的估计量与推断方法。我们还提供了观测与反事实限制平均生存时间之间差异的非参数界及推断。通过数值研究以及对择期颈清扫术对高级别腮腺癌患者死亡率因果效应的分析,我们展示了所提出方法的性能。