This paper investigates the game theory of resource-allocation situations where the "first come, first serve" heuristic creates inequitable, asymmetric benefits to the players. Specifically, this problem is formulated as a Generalized Nash Equilibrium Model where the players are arranged sequentially along a directed line graph. The goal of the model is to reduce the asymmetric benefits among the players using a policy instrument. It serves as a more realistic, alternative approach to the line-graph models considered in the cooperative game-theoretic literature. An application-oriented formulation is also developed for water resource systems. The players in this model are utilities who withdraw water and are arranged along a river basin from upstream to downstream. This model is applied to a stylized, three-node model as well as a test bed in the Duck River Basin in Tennessee, USA. Based on the results, a non-cooperative, water-release market can be an acceptable policy instrument according to metrics traditionally used in cooperative game theory
翻译:本文调查了资源分配情况的游戏理论,即“先到先得,先到先得”的逻辑为参与者创造了不公平的、不对称的利益。 具体地说, 这一问题被写成一个通用的Nash 平衡模型, 参与者按照定向线形图顺序排列。 模型的目标是减少使用政策工具的参与者之间的非对称利益。 它作为合作游戏理论文献中考虑的线性模型的一种更现实的替代方法。 也为水资源系统开发了一个面向应用的配方。 这个模型的参与者是从上游到下游沿河流域抽水的公用事业。 这个模型适用于美国田纳西州鸭河盆地的一个三节模式和测试床。 根据结果, 一个不合作的、水释放市场可以是一种可以接受的政策工具,根据合作游戏理论中传统上使用的衡量标准。