Score tests have the advantage of requiring estimation alone of the model restricted by the null hypothesis, which often is much simpler than models defined under the alternative hypothesis. This is typically so when the alternative hypothesis involves inequality constraints. However, existing score tests address only jointly testing all parameters of interest; a leading example is testing all ARCH parameters or variances of random coefficients being zero or not. In such testing problems rejection of the null hypothesis does not provide evidence on rejection of specific elements of parameter of interest. This paper proposes a class of one-sided score tests for testing a model parameter that is subject to inequality constraints. Proposed tests are constructed based on the minimum of a set of $p$-values. The minimand includes the $p$-values for testing individual elements of parameter of interest using individual scores. It may be extended to include a $p$-value of existing score tests. We show that our tests perform better than/or perform as good as existing score tests in terms of joint testing, and has furthermore the added benefit of allowing for simultaneously testing individual elements of parameter of interest. The added benefit is appealing in the sense that it can identify a model without estimating it. We illustrate our tests in linear regression models, ARCH and random coefficient models. A detailed simulation study is provided to examine the finite sample performance of the proposed tests and we find that our tests perform well as expected.
翻译:计分测试的优点是,只要求估算受无效假设限制的模型,这种假设往往比替代假设下界定的模型简单得多。当替代假设涉及不平等的限制时,通常如此。但是,现有的得分测试只涉及共同测试所有利益参数;一个主要例子是测试所有ARCH参数或随机系数的零值差异。在这种测试中,否定无效假设并不提供拒绝特定利益参数要素的证据。本文建议为测试一个受不平等制约的模型参数而进行一类单向得分测试。提议的测试基于一套美元价值的最低值。最小值和包括使用个别得分测试单个利益参数参数的美元价值。它可能扩大以包括现有得分测试的美元价值。在联合测试中,我们的测试效果优于/或表现为现有得分参数的优于现有的得分测试。此外,允许同时测试个别利益参数的额外好处是,从某种意义上说,它可以确定一个模型,而不用估算个人得分来测试单个利益参数。我们用微型和微型价值测试包括用于测试单个参数的美元价值。我们可以扩大现有得分测试范围,我们通过随机的测试来进行我们的测试,我们提出的直线性测试。我们为测测测测测度模型和测测测。