The debate on "Net-neutrality" and events pointing towards its possible violations have led to the development of tools to detect deliberate traffic discrimination on the Internet. Given the complex nature of the Internet, neutrality violations are not easy to detect, and tools developed so far suffer from various limitations. In this paper, we study many challenges in detecting the violations and discuss possible approaches to mitigate them. As a case study, we focus on the tool Wehe \cite{wehe} and discuss its limitations and propose the aspects that need to be strengthened. Wehe is the most recent tool to detect neutrality violations. Despite Wehe's vast utility and possible influences over policy decisions, its mechanisms are not yet fully validated by researchers other than original tool developers. We seek to fill this gap by conducting a thorough and in-depth validation of Wehe. Our validation uses the Wehe App, a client-server setup mimicking Wehe's behavior and its theoretical arguments. We validated the Wehe app for its methodology, traffic discrimination detection, and operational environments. We found that the critical weaknesses of the Wehe App are due to its design choices of using port number 80, overlooking the effect of background traffic, and the direct performance comparison.
翻译:关于“网络中立性”的辩论和表明其可能违规行为的事件导致开发了发现互联网上蓄意交通歧视的工具。鉴于互联网的复杂性,发现中立性歧视并非易事,而且迄今开发的工具受到各种限制。在本文中,我们研究了在发现违规现象方面的许多挑战,并讨论了可能的缓解方法。作为案例研究,我们把重点放在了工具Whe\cite{wehe}上,并讨论了其局限性,并提出了需要加强的方面。我们是发现违反中立行为的最新工具。尽管他有着巨大的效用,而且可能对政策决定产生影响,但除了原始工具开发者之外,其他研究人员尚未充分验证其机制。我们力求通过彻底和深入的验证Wehe来填补这一空白。我们的验证使用了“Wehe App”,即一个客户-服务器,它模仿了Wehe的行为及其理论论点。我们验证了“Wehe-服务器”的应用程序,以其方法、交通歧视探测和业务环境为依据。我们发现,“Wheap”的关键弱点在于它设计如何选择使用第80号港口,过度对比背景交通的效果。