Time-to-event analysis often relies on prior parametric assumptions, or, if a non-parametric approach is chosen, Cox's model. This is inherently tied to the assumption of proportional hazards, with the analysis potentially invalidated if this assumption is not fulfilled. In addition, most interpretations focus on the hazard ratio, that is often misinterpreted as the relative risk. In this paper, we introduce an alternative to current methodology for assessing a treatment effect in a two-group situation, not relying on the proportional hazards assumption but assuming proportional risks. Precisely, we propose a new non-parametric model to directly estimate the relative risk of two groups to experience an event under the assumption that the risk ratio is constant over time. In addition to this relative measure, our model allows for calculating the number needed to treat as an absolute measure, providing the possibility of an easy and holistic interpretation of the data. We demonstrate the validity of the approach by means of a simulation study and present an application to data from a large randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of dapagliflozin on the risk of first hospitalization for heart failure.
翻译:时间对活动的分析往往依赖于先前的参数假设,或者,如果选择非参数假设,Cox的模型。这与比例危害的假设有着内在的联系,如果这一假设没有实现,分析就可能无效。此外,大多数解释侧重于危险比率,这往往被误解为相对风险。在本文中,我们采用了一种替代目前方法,用以评估两组情况下的治疗效果,而不是依赖比例危害假设,而是承担比例风险。确切地说,我们提出了一个新的非参数模型,以直接估计两组人经历一个事件的相对风险,假设风险比率是长期不变的。除了这一相对尺度外,我们的模型还允许计算作为绝对措施处理的数字,提供对数据进行简单和全面解释的可能性。我们通过模拟研究来证明这一方法的有效性,并对大规模随机控制的试验中的数据进行应用,调查dapagliflozin对心脏病首次住院风险的影响。</s>