Academic citation and social attention measure different dimensions of the impact of research results. Both measures do not correlate with each other, and they are influenced by many factors. Among these factors are the field of research, the type of access, and co-authorship. In this study, the increase in the impact due to co-authorship in scientific articles disaggregated by field of research and access type, was quantified. For this, the citations and social attention accumulated until the year 2021 by a total of 244,880 research articles published in the year 2018, were analyzed. The data source was Dimensions.ai, and the units of study were research articles in Economics, History and Archaeology, and Mathematics. As the main results, a small proportion of the articles received a large part of the citations and most of the social attention. Both citations and social attention in-creased, in general, with the number of co-authors. Thus, the greater the number of co-authors, the greater the probability of being cited in academic articles and mentioned on social media. The advantage in citation and social attention due to collaboration is independent of the access type for the publication. Furthermore, although collaboration with an additional co-author is in general positive in terms of citation and social attention, these positive effects reduce as the number of co-authors increases.
翻译:学术引用和社会关注衡量了研究成果影响的不同层面,这两项措施相互不相关,而且受到许多因素的影响,其中包括研究领域、访问类型和共同作者。本研究报告量化了按研究和访问类型分列共同撰写科学文章所造成的影响增加;为此,对截至2021年共发表244,880篇研究文章至2018年累积的244,880篇引文和社会关注进行了分析;对数据来源进行了分析,即Deffects.ai,研究单位是经济学、历史和考古学以及数学的研究文章。主要成果是,一小部分文章得到大量引用和大部分社会关注;一般而言,引用和社会关注增加,共同作者数目增加;因此,共同作者数目越多,在学术文章中引用和提及社会媒体的可能性越大。引用和社会关注的优势在于经济学、历史和考古学以及数学领域的研究文章。作为主要成果,只有一小部分文章得到引用和大部分社会关注;总的来说,共同作者对获取这些出版物的积极影响在增加。