We examine how Canadians living in the East York section of Toronto exchange social support. Just as we have had to deconstruct social support to understand its component parts, we now deconstruct how different types of communication technologies play socially supportive roles. We draw on 101 in-depth interviews conducted in 2013-2014 to shed light on the support networks of a sample of East York residents and discern the role of communication technologies in the exchange of different types of social support across age groups. Our findings show that not much has changed since the 1960s in terms of the social ties that our sample of East Yorkers have, and the types of support mobilized via social networks: companionship, small and large services, emotional aid, and financial support. What has changed is how communication technologies interweave in complex ways with different types of social ties (partners, siblings, friends, etc.) to mobilize social support. We found that with siblings and extended kin communication technologies could boost the frequency of interaction and help exchange support at a distance. With friendship ties, communication technologies provide a continuous, constant flow of interaction. We draw implications for theories of social support and for social policy linked to interventions aimed at helping vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 pandemic.
翻译:我们审视了居住在多伦多东纽约区的加拿大人如何交换社会支助。正如我们不得不解构社会支助以理解其组成部分一样,我们现在也解构了不同类型的通信技术如何发挥社会支助作用。我们利用2013-2014年进行的101次深入访谈,以了解一组东纽约居民的抽样支助网络,并辨别通信技术在跨年龄组不同类型社会支助交流中的作用。我们的研究结果显示,自1960年代以来,我们抽样的东纽约人的社会联系没有发生多大变化,通过社交网络调动的支助类型:伴侣关系、小型和大型服务、情感援助和财政支持。我们发现,通信技术如何以复杂的方式与不同类型社会联系(伙伴、兄弟姐妹、朋友等)进行互动,以调动社会支助。我们发现,与兄弟姐妹和远亲近的通信技术可以提高互动频率,帮助交流支持。通过友谊联系,通信技术提供持续、持续的互动。我们对社会支助理论和与旨在帮助COVI期间弱势群体的干预措施相联系的社会政策产生了影响。