This paper determines whether the two core data protection principles of data minimisation and purpose limitation can be meaningfully implemented in data-driven systems. While contemporary data processing practices appear to stand at odds with these principles, we demonstrate that systems could technically use much less data than they currently do. This observation is a starting point for our detailed techno-legal analysis uncovering obstacles that stand in the way of meaningful implementation and compliance as well as exemplifying unexpected trade-offs which emerge where data protection law is applied in practice. Our analysis seeks to inform debates about the impact of data protection on the development of artificial intelligence in the European Union, offering practical action points for data controllers, regulators, and researchers.
翻译:本文件决定了数据最小化和目的限制这两个核心数据保护原则能否在数据驱动系统中得到有意义的执行。当代数据处理做法似乎与这些原则不一致,但我们表明,在技术上,各系统可以比目前少得多地使用数据。这一观察是我们详细技术-法律分析的起点,它揭示了妨碍有意义地执行和遵守的障碍,并举例说明了在实践中适用数据保护法时出现的意外取舍。我们的分析旨在为关于数据保护对欧洲联盟人为情报发展的影响的辩论提供信息,为数据控制者、监管者和研究人员提供了实际行动点。