Studies on interpersonal conflict have a long history and contain many suggestions for conflict typology. We use this as the basis of a novel annotation scheme and release a new dataset of situations and conflict aspect annotations. We then build a classifier to predict whether someone will perceive the actions of one individual as right or wrong in a given situation, outperforming previous work on this task. Our analyses include conflict aspects, but also generated clusters, which are human validated, and show differences in conflict content based on the relationship of participants to the author. Our findings have important implications for understanding conflict and social norms.
翻译:关于人际冲突的研究历史悠久,并载有许多关于冲突类型的建议。我们以此为基础,制定新的说明计划,并发布新的局势和冲突说明数据集。然后,我们建立一个分类师,预测在特定局势中,一个人的行动是否会被视为对或错,这比以前关于这项任务的工作要好。我们的分析包括冲突方面,但也产生了由人类验证的集群,并显示基于参与者与作者关系的冲突内容差异。我们的调查结果对理解冲突和社会规范有重要影响。