Mainstream food delivery platforms, like DoorDash and Uber Eats, have been the locus of fierce policy debates about their unfair business and labor practices. At the same time, hundreds of independent food delivery services provide alternative opportunities to many communities across the U.S. We surveyed operators of independent food delivery platforms to learn about their perception of the role of public policy. We found conflicting opinions on whether and how policy should interact with their businesses, ranging from not wanting policymakers to interfere to articulating specific policies that would curtail mainstream platforms' business practices. We provide insights for technologists and policymakers interested in the sociotechnical challenges of local marketplaces.
翻译:主流的餐饮送餐平台(如DoorDash和Uber Eats)一直是关于其不公平的商业和劳动实践的激烈政策辩论的焦点。与此同时,数百家独立的送餐服务为美国许多社区提供了替代机会。我们对独立送餐平台的运营者进行了调查,以了解他们对公共政策的看法。我们发现他们对政策是否应该干预他们的企业存在不同意见,从不希望政策制定者干预到明确阐述会限制主流平台商业实践的特定政策议程。我们提供了对于对地方市场感兴趣的技术人员和政策制定者思考社会技术挑战的见解和建议。