Network Creation Games are an important framework for understanding the formation of real-world networks. These games usually assume a set of indistinguishable agents strategically buying edges at a uniform price leading to a network among them. However, in real life, agents are heterogeneous and their relationships often display a bias towards similar agents, say of the same ethnic group. This homophilic behavior on the agent level can then lead to the emergent global phenomenon of social segregation. We initiate the study of Network Creation Games with multiple types of homophilic agents and non-uniform edge cost. Specifically, we introduce and compare two models, focusing on the perception of same-type and different-type neighboring agents, respectively. Despite their different initial conditions, both our theoretical and experimental analysis show that the resulting stable networks are almost identical in the two models, indicating a robust structure of social networks under homophily. Moreover, we investigate the segregation strength of the formed networks and thereby offer new insights on understanding segregation.
翻译:创建网络运动会是理解真实世界网络形成的重要框架。 这些游戏通常假定一系列无法区分的代理商以统一的价格从战略上购买优势,最终形成网络。 但是,在现实生活中,代理商是多种多样的,他们的关系往往表现出对类似代理商的偏向,比如同一族裔群体。 代理商一级的这种同性行为可能导致新出现的全球社会隔离现象。 我们开始研究网络创建运动会,研究有多种类型的同性代理商和非统一的边际成本。 具体地说,我们引入和比较两种模式,分别侧重于对同类和不同类型邻里代理商的看法。 尽管最初的情况不同,我们的理论和实验分析都表明,由此形成的稳定的网络在两种模式中几乎完全相同,表明在同性模式下的社会网络结构非常健全。 此外,我们调查了组成网络的隔离力量,从而提供了理解隔离的新见解。