Society is showing signs of strong ideological polarization. When pushed to seek perspectives different from their own, people often reject diverse ideas or find them unfathomable. Work has shown that framing controversial issues using the values of the audience can improve understanding of opposing views. In this paper, we present our work designing systems for addressing ideological division through educating U.S. news consumers to engage using a framework of fundamental human values known as Moral Foundations. We design and implement a series of new features that encourage users to challenge their understanding of opposing views, including annotation of moral frames in news articles, discussion of those frames via inline comments, and recommendations based on relevant moral frames. We describe two versions of features -- the first covering a suite of ways to interact with moral framing in news, and the second tailored towards collaborative annotation and discussion. We conduct a field evaluation of each design iteration with 71 participants in total over a period of 6-8 days, finding evidence suggesting users learned to re-frame their discourse in moral values of the opposing side. Our work provides several design considerations for building systems to engage with moral framing.
翻译:社会正在表现出强烈的意识形态两极分化的迹象。当人们被推向寻求与自己不同的观点时,人们往往拒绝不同的观点,或发现这些观点不可理解。工作表明,利用受众的价值观构建有争议的问题可以增进对相反观点的理解。在本文中,我们介绍了我们的工作,通过教育美国新闻消费者使用被称为道德基础的基本人类价值观框架,设计解决意识形态分歧的制度。我们设计和实施了一系列新特征,鼓励用户质疑他们对对立观点的理解,包括新闻文章中的道德框架说明、通过在线评论讨论这些框架以及基于相关道德框架的建议。我们描述了两种特征的两种版本 -- -- 第一个版本涉及与新闻道德框架互动的一套方式,第二个版本专门设计为协作性说明和讨论。我们用6-8天的时间对每项设计进行实地评价,总共有71名参与者参加,找到证据,表明用户学会在对立方的道德价值观中重新表述他们的言论。我们的工作为建立道德框架提供了几个设计方面的考虑。