Designers' use of deceptive and manipulative design practices have become increasingly ubiquitous, impacting users' ability to make choices that respect their agency and autonomy. These practices have been popularly defined through the term "dark patterns" which has gained attention from designers, privacy scholars, and more recently, even legal scholars and regulators. The increased interest in the term and underpinnings of dark patterns across a range of sociotechnical practitioners intrigued us to study the evolution of the concept, to potentially speculate the future trajectory of conversations around dark patterns. In this paper, we examine the history and evolution of the Twitter discourse through #darkpatterns from its inception in June 2010 until April 2021, using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to describe how this discourse has changed over time. We frame the evolution of this discourse as an emergent transdisciplinary conversation that connects multiple disciplinary perspectives through the shared concept of dark patterns, whereby these participants engage in a conversation marked by socio-technical angst in order to identify and fight back against deceptive design practices. We discuss the potential future trajectories of this discourse and opportunities for further scholarship at the intersection of design, policy, and activism.
翻译:设计者对欺骗性和操纵性设计做法的使用越来越普遍,影响到用户做出尊重其代理和自主选择的能力。这些做法通过“暗型”这一术语被广泛界定,这引起了设计者、隐私学者、甚至法律学者和监管者的注意。 一系列社会技术从业者对暗型的术语和基础的兴趣日益增强,使我们对这一概念的演变进行了研究,从而有可能猜测未来围绕暗型对话的轨迹。在本文中,我们研究了从2010年6月启动到2021年4月通过#darkpatters(#darkpaters)的Twitter对话的历史和演变,使用了定量和定性的组合方法来描述这种对话在一段时间内如何变化。我们把这一对话的演化设计设计设计过程、政策与互动中进一步学习的机会。