In micro-blogging platforms, people connect and interact with others. However, due to cognitive biases, they tend to interact with like-minded people and read agreeable information only. Many efforts to make people connect with those who think differently have not worked well. In this paper, we hypothesize, first, that previous approaches have not worked because they have been direct -- they have tried to explicitly connect people with those having opposing views on sensitive issues. Second, that neither recommendation or presentation of information by themselves are enough to encourage behavioral change. We propose a platform that mixes a recommender algorithm and a visualization-based user interface to explore recommendations. It recommends politically diverse profiles in terms of distance of latent topics, and displays those recommendations in a visual representation of each user's personal content. We performed an "in the wild" evaluation of this platform, and found that people explored more recommendations when using a biased algorithm instead of ours. In line with our hypothesis, we also found that the mixture of our recommender algorithm and our user interface, allowed politically interested users to exhibit an unbiased exploration of the recommended profiles. Finally, our results contribute insights in two aspects: first, which individual differences are important when designing platforms aimed at behavioral change; and second, which algorithms and user interfaces should be mixed to help users avoid cognitive mechanisms that lead to biased behavior.
翻译:在微博客平台中,人们与其他人联系和互动。然而,由于认知偏差,他们倾向于与志同道合的人互动,只阅读可接受的信息。许多努力使人与认为不同的人建立联系的努力效果不好。在本文中,我们假设先前的方法之所以没有奏效,是因为它们是直接的 -- -- 他们试图将人与对敏感问题持相反观点的人明确联系起来。第二,他们自己建议或提供信息都不足以鼓励行为变化。我们提议了一个平台,将推荐者算法和视觉化用户界面混在一起,以探索建议。我们建议了一个平台,在潜在主题的距离方面提出了政治多样性的描述,并在每个用户的个人内容的视觉展示中展示了这些建议。我们进行了“野生”评价,发现以前的方法之所以没有奏效,是因为这些方法是直接的 -- -- 他们试图将人与在敏感问题上持偏见的算法和用户界面联系起来,我们也发现我们的推荐者算法和用户界面的混合物,使得政治上感兴趣的用户能够对推荐的概况进行公正的探讨。最后,我们的第二个结果在两个方面提供了深刻的见解:首先,我们的结果有助于了解每个用户的个人行为,在设计进化的界面时,这才是重要的。