Social comparison -- the process of evaluating one's rewards relative to others -- plays a fundamental role in primate social cognition. However, it remains unknown from a computational perspective how information about others' rewards affects the evaluation of one's own reward. With a constructive approach, this study examines whether monkeys merely recognize objective reward differences or, instead, infer others' subjective reward valuations. We developed three computational models with varying degrees of social information processing: an Internal Prediction Model (IPM), which infers the partner's subjective values; a No Comparison Model (NCM), which disregards partner information; and an External Comparison Model (ECM), which directly incorporates the partner's objective rewards. To test model performance, we used a multi-layered, multimodal latent Dirichlet allocation. We trained the models on a dataset containing the behavior of a pair of monkeys, their rewards, and the conditioned stimuli. Then, we evaluated the models' ability to classify subjective values across pre-defined experimental conditions. The ECM achieved the highest classification score in the Rand Index (0.88 vs. 0.79 for the IPM) under our settings, suggesting that social comparison relies on objective reward differences rather than inferences about subjective states.
翻译:社会比较——即个体评估自身奖赏相对于他人的过程——在灵长类社会认知中发挥着基础性作用。然而,从计算视角来看,关于他人奖赏的信息如何影响个体对自身奖赏的评估仍不明确。本研究采用建构性方法,探究猴子仅是识别客观奖赏差异,还是进一步推断他人的主观奖赏估值。我们构建了三种具有不同社会信息处理程度的计算模型:推断同伴主观价值的内在预测模型(IPM)、忽略同伴信息的无比较模型(NCM),以及直接整合同伴客观奖赏的外在比较模型(ECM)。为检验模型性能,我们采用多层多模态潜在狄利克雷分配方法。利用包含一对猴子行为数据、奖赏信息及条件刺激的数据集对模型进行训练,随后评估模型在预设实验条件下对主观价值的分类能力。在我们的实验设置中,ECM在兰德指数上取得了最高分类得分(0.88,IPM为0.79),这表明社会比较依赖于客观奖赏差异而非对主观状态的推断。