This paper defines a methodology with in-depth data to identify the skills needed by riders in the highest risk crash configurations to reduce casualty rates. We present a case study using in-depth data of 803 powered-two-wheeler crashes. Seven high-risk crash configuration based on the pre-crash trajectories of the road-users involved were considered to investigate the human errors as crash contributors. Primary crash contributing factor, evasive manoeuvres performed, horizontal roadway alignment and speed-related factors were identified, along with the most frequent configurations and those with the greatest risk of severe injury. Straight Crossing Path/Lateral Direction was the most frequent crash configuration and Turn Across Path/ Opposing Direction that with the greatest risk of serious injury were identified. Multi-vehicle crashes cannot be considered as a homogenous category of crashes to which the same human failure is attributed, as different interactions between motorcyclists and other road users are associated with both different types of human error and different rider reactions. Human error in multiple-vehicle crashes related to crossing paths configurations were different from errors related to rear-end or head-on crashes. Multi-vehicle head-on crashes and single-vehicle collisions frequently occur along curves. The involved collision avoidance manoeuvres of the riders differed significantly among the highest risk crash configurations. The most relevant lack of skills are identified and linked to their most representative context. In most cases a combination of different skills was required simultaneously to avoid the crash. The findings underline the need to group accident cases, beyond the usual single-vehicle versus multi-vehicle collision approach. Our methodology can also be applied to support preventive actions based on riders training and eventually ADAS design.
翻译:本文界定了一种方法,其中含有深入的数据,用以确定在最高风险坠毁配置中骑手为降低伤亡率而需要的技能; 我们利用803次电动两轮撞车的深度数据进行案例研究; 根据所涉道路使用者的坠毁前轨迹进行七次高风险坠毁配置,被视为作为坠毁者对人为错误进行调查; 主要坠毁因素、进行的蒸发机动、横向路程调整和速度相关因素,以及最频繁的组合和严重伤害风险最大者。 直接跨路/航道方向是最常见的一次坠毁配置和转过路路/航道方向的深度数据; 查明了有最大严重伤害风险的七次高风险坠毁配置; 多车辆碰撞不能被视为同属一起的碰撞类型,因为机动车驾驶者和其他道路使用者之间的相互作用与不同的人类错误和骑车者的反应有关; 与跨路结构有关的多车预防碰撞的错误与后端或头撞车的错误不同; 最经常发生的机动车撞车的机动方法,也与最有相关风险。