This is an attempt to formalize the conditions of possibility for free, libre, open access to scientific knowledge within a game. The challenge is to enunciate the terms under which agents participating in the Grand conversation of science would be willing to open share, exchange, negotiate or surrender their contributions, considering their corresponding intentions, goals, beliefs and expected utilities. Many conclusions can be drawn from the game here described. We have made many simplifying decisions along the modelling process that must be taken into account as a determining context for those conclusions, of course. It can be safely state, however, that under the current conditions of the game, Editors will keep betting on Toll Access, knowledge distribution models even if all the other Academic agent go for Open Access.
翻译:这是试图正式确定在游戏中自由、自由、开放地获取科学知识的可能性条件,挑战在于阐明参加Grand科学对话的机构愿意开放分享、交流、谈判或放弃其贡献的条件,同时考虑到其相应的意图、目标、信仰和预期的公用事业。从这里所描述的游戏中可以得出许多结论。我们在建模过程中做了许多简化决定,当然,这些决定必须作为这些结论的决定性背景加以考虑。然而,可以安全地指出,在当前的游戏条件下,编辑们将继续在Tull Access上打赌,知识传播模式,即使所有其他学术代理人都参加公开访问。