In this paper, we present an alternative interpretation of propositional inquisitive logic as an epistemic logic of knowing how. In our setting, an inquisitive logic formula $\alpha$ being supported by a state is formalized as "knowing how to resolve $\alpha$" (more colloquially, "knowing how $\alpha$ is true") holds on the S5 epistemic model corresponding to the state. Based on this epistemic interpretation, we use a dynamic epistemic logic with both know-how and know-that operators to capture the epistemic information behind the innocent-looking connectives in inquisitive logic. We show that the set of valid know-how formulas corresponds precisely to the inquisitive logic. The main result is a complete axiomatization with intuitive axioms using the full dynamic epistemic language. Moreover, we show that the know-how operator and the dynamic operator can both be eliminated without changing the expressivity over models, which is consistent with the modal translation of inquisitive logic existing in the literature. We hope our framework can give an intuitive alternative interpretation of various concepts and technical results in inquisitive logic, and also provide a powerful and flexible tool to do inquisitive reasoning in an epistemic context.
翻译:在本文中,我们提出了对普惠性疑惑逻辑的替代解释,作为知道如何理解的隐喻逻辑。 在我们的设置中,一个由国家支持的疑惑性逻辑公式 $\ alpha$ 被正式定为“知道如何解决$\ alpha$ ” (更具体地说,“知道$\ alpha$是真实的 ” ) 。 其主要结果是完全的分解,使用完全动态的直觉语言。此外,我们表明,在不改变对模型的直观理解性的情况下,知识操作者和动态操作者都可以被消灭,而这种直观的逻辑和知识操作者可以捕捉到在纯正反逻辑逻辑逻辑逻辑逻辑逻辑背后的缩写信息。 我们显示,一套有效的知识公式和一套与疑惑性逻辑模型的解译法完全吻合。 我们的逻辑逻辑框架和各种逻辑框架提供了一种动态的逻辑思维。 我们的希望可以提供一种动态的逻辑框架,在各种文献中提供一种动态的弹性逻辑解释。