A growing number of people engage in online health forums, making it important to understand the quality of the advice they receive. In this paper, we explore the role of expertise in responses provided to help-seeking posts regarding mental health. We study the differences between (1) interactions with peers; and (2) interactions with self-identified mental health professionals. First, we show that a classifier can distinguish between these two groups, indicating that their language use does in fact differ. To understand this difference, we perform several analyses addressing engagement aspects, including whether their comments engage the support-seeker further as well as linguistic aspects, such as dominant language and linguistic style matching. Our work contributes toward the developing efforts of understanding how health experts engage with health information- and support-seekers in social networks. More broadly, it is a step toward a deeper understanding of the styles of interactions that cultivate supportive engagement in online communities.
翻译:越来越多的人参加了在线健康论坛,因此了解他们所收到建议的质量非常重要。在本文中,我们探讨了专门知识在为寻求心理健康帮助的岗位提供回应方面的作用。我们研究了(1) 与同行的互动;(2) 与自我认定的心理健康专业人士的互动之间的差异。首先,我们表明,分类者可以区分这两个群体,表明他们的语言使用事实上是不同的。为了理解这一差异,我们进行了几项关于参与方面的分析,包括他们的意见是否让寻求支持者进一步接触,以及语言方面,如主导语言和语言风格匹配。我们的工作有助于培养对卫生专家如何在社会网络中与健康信息和寻求支持者接触的理解。更广泛地说,这是深入了解互动方式的一个步骤,这种互动方式在网上社区培养支持性参与。