Citing is an important aspect of scientific discourse and important for quantifying the scientific impact quantification of researchers. Previous works observed that citations are made not only based on the pure scholarly contributions but also based on non-scholarly attributes, such as the affiliation or gender of authors. In this way, citation bias is produced. Existing works, however, have not analyzed preprints with respect to citation bias, although they play an increasingly important role in modern scholarly communication. In this paper, we investigate whether preprints are affected by citation bias with respect to the author affiliation. We measure citation bias for bioRxiv preprints and their publisher versions at the institution level and country level, using the Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient. This allows us to mitigate the effects of confounding factors and see whether or not citation biases related to author affiliation have an increased effect on preprint citations. We observe consistent higher Gini coefficients for preprints than those for publisher versions. Thus, we can confirm that citation bias exists and that it is more severe in case of preprints. As preprints are on the rise, affiliation-based citation bias is, thus, an important topic not only for authors (e.g., when deciding what to cite), but also to people and institutions that use citations for scientific impact quantification (e.g., funding agencies deciding about funding based on citation counts).
翻译:先前的著作指出,引文不仅基于纯粹的学术贡献,而且基于非学科属性,例如作者的属性或性别,因此产生了引文偏见。现有的著作没有分析引文偏见的预印本,尽管在现代学术交流中它们发挥着越来越重要的作用。在本文中,我们调查预印本是否受到引证与作者关系偏见的影响。我们用Lorenz曲线和基尼系数衡量生物氧化预印及其在机构和国家一级的出版版本的引用偏差,这使我们能够减轻混杂因素的影响,看看与作者关联有关的引文偏见是否对预印引文的引用影响更大。我们观察到预印的吉尼系数在现代学术交流中一直高于出版版本。因此,我们可以确认,引文偏见的存在,在预印方面更为严重。因为预印在机构一级和国家一级,我们用Lorenz曲线和基尼系数衡量引文的偏向性偏差,这使我们能够减轻混杂因素的影响,看看与作者关联有关的偏见是否对引文的引用产生更大的影响。我们可以看到,因此,在决定作者的统计学额时,也只能引用偏见。