Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are designed to improve vehicle safety. However, it is difficult to achieve such benefits without understanding the causes and limitations of the current ADAS and their possible solutions. This study 1) investigated the limitations and solutions of ADAS through a literature review, 2) identified the causes and effects of ADAS through consumer complaints using natural language processing models, and 3) compared the major differences between the two. These two lines of research identified similar categories of ADAS causes, including human factors, environmental factors, and vehicle factors. However, academic research focused more on human factors of ADAS issues and proposed advanced algorithms to mitigate such issues while drivers complained more of vehicle factors of ADAS failures, which led to associated top consequences. The findings from these two sources tend to complement each other and provide important implications for the improvement of ADAS in the future.
翻译:高级驾驶员协助系统(ADAS)旨在改进车辆安全,然而,如果不理解目前ADAS的成因和局限性及其可能的解决办法,就难以实现这些好处;本研究报告(1) 通过文献审查调查ADAS的局限性和解决办法;(2) 通过使用自然语言处理模式的消费者投诉,查明ADAS的成因和影响;(3) 比较两者之间的主要差异;这两组研究查明了ADAS的成因的相似类别,包括人的因素、环境因素和车辆因素;然而,学术研究更侧重于ADAS问题的人为因素和拟议的先进算法,以缓解这些问题,而司机则抱怨了ADAS失败的成因,从而导致相关的最大后果;这两个来源的调查结果往往相互补充,对今后改进ADAS产生重要影响。