When network products and services become more valuable as their userbase grows (network effects), this tendency can become a major determinant of how they compete with each other in the market and how the market is structured. Network effects are traditionally linked to high market concentration, early-mover advantages, and entry barriers, and in the cryptoasset market they have been used as a valuation tool too. The recent resurgence of Bitcoin has been partly attributed to network effects too. We study the existence of network effects in six cryptoassets from their inception to obtain a high-level overview of the application of network effects in the cryptoasset market. We show that contrary to the usual implications of network effects, they do not serve to concentrate the cryptoasset market, nor do they accord any one cryptoasset a definitive competitive advantage, nor are they consistent enough to be reliable valuation tools. Therefore, while network effects do occur in cryptoasset networks, they are not a defining feature of the cryptoasset market as a whole.
翻译:当网络产品和服务随着用户基础的增长(网络效应)而变得更为宝贵时,这种倾向会成为它们如何在市场上相互竞争以及市场结构如何的主要决定因素。网络效应传统上与市场高度集中、早期超额优势和进入壁垒有关,在加密资产市场中,它们也被用作估价工具。Bitcoin最近重新兴起的部分原因是网络效应。我们研究6个加密资产从一开始就存在网络效应,以便获得对加密资产市场中网络效应应用的高级概览。我们表明,与通常的网络效应的影响相反,这些效应无助于集中加密资产市场,也不会给任何加密资产市场带来明确的竞争优势,也不够一致,无法成为可靠的估价工具。因此,虽然在加密资产网络中确实存在网络效应,但它们不是整个加密资产市场的一个决定性特征。