The literature for fairness-aware machine learning knows a plethora of different fairness notions. It is however wellknown, that it is impossible to satisfy all of them, as certain notions contradict each other. In this paper, we take a closer look at academic performance prediction (APP) systems and try to distil which fairness notions suit this task most. For this, we scan recent literature proposing guidelines as to which fairness notion to use and apply these guidelines onto APP. Our findings suggest equalised odds as most suitable notion for APP, based on APP's WYSIWYG worldview as well as potential long-term improvements for the population.
翻译:公平意识机器学习的文献知道许多不同的公平概念,但众所周知,由于某些概念相互矛盾,因此不可能满足所有这些概念,在本文中,我们更仔细地研究学术业绩预测(APP)系统,并试图挖掘哪些公平概念最适合这项任务。为此,我们扫描最近提出的准则,说明哪些公平概念可以使用,并将这些准则应用于APP。我们的调查结果表明,根据APP的WYSIWYG世界观,机会均等是APP的最合适的概念,而且可能对人民产生长期改善。