Reproducibility and comparability of empirical results are at the core tenet of the scientific method in any scientific field. To ease reproducibility of empirical studies, several benchmarks in software engineering research, such as Defects4J, have been developed and widely used. For quantum software engineering research, however, no benchmark has been established yet. In this position paper, we propose a new benchmark -- named QBugs -- which will provide experimental subjects and an experimental infrastructure to ease the evaluation of new research and the reproducibility of previously published results on quantum software engineering.
翻译:任何科学领域科学方法的核心原则都是经验结果的可复制性和可比性。为了便利经验研究的可复制性,已经制定并广泛使用软件工程研究的若干基准,例如Desects4J,但是,对于量子软件工程研究,尚未确定基准。在本立场文件中,我们提议一个新的基准 -- -- 名为QBugs -- -- 将提供实验科目和实验基础设施,以方便对新研究的评价和对以前公布的量子软件工程结果的可复制性进行评估。