This paper critically discusses the use and merits of global indices, in particular, the Global Health Security Index or GHSI (Cameron et 2019) in times of an imminent crisis, like the current pandemic. The index ranked 195 countries according to their expected preparedness in case of a pandemic or other biological threat. The Covid-19 pandemic provides the background to compare each country's predicted performance from the GHSI with the actual performance. In general, there is an inverted relation between predicted versus actual performance, i.e. the predicted top performers are among those that are the worst hit. Obviously, this reflects poorly on the potential policy uses of the index in imminent crisis management. The paper also uses two different data sets, one from the Worldmeter on the spread of the Covid-19 pandemics, and the other one from the INGSA policy tracker, to make comparisons between the actual introduction of pandemic response policies and the corresponding death rate in 29 selected countries.
翻译:本文件批判性地讨论了全球指数的使用和优点,特别是全球卫生安全指数或全球统一制度(Cameron et 2019)在即将爆发的危机(如当前大流行病)时的使用情况和优点。该指数根据各国在发生大流行病或其他生物威胁时的预期准备情况,排在第195位。Covid-19大流行为比较每个国家从全球统一制度预测的绩效和实际绩效提供了背景。一般而言,预测与实际绩效之间的反向关系,即预测的顶级表现者是受打击最严重的国家。这显然没有很好地反映指数在即将来临的危机管理中的潜在政策用途。本文还使用了两种不同的数据集,一种来自关于Covid-19大流行蔓延的世界仪,另一种来自INGSA政策追踪器,以比较29个选定国家实际采用流行病应对政策的情况和相应的死亡率。