The paper presents a conceptual, multidimensional approach to understand the technological factors that are assumed to or even have been proven to contribute to what has been coined as Zoom Fatigue (ZF) or more generally Videoconferencing Fatigue (VCF). With the advent of the Covid-19 pandemic, the usage of VC services has drastically increased, leading to more and more reports about the ZF or VCF phenomenon. The paper is motivated by the fact that some of the media outlets initially starting the debate on what Zoom fatigue is and how it can be avoided, as well as some of the scientific papers addressing the topic, contain assumptions that are rather hypothetical and insufficiently underpinned by scientific evidence. Most of these works are acknowledge the lacking evidence and partly suggest directions for future research. This paper intends to deepen the survey of VC-technology-related literature and to provide more existing evidence, where possible, while reviewing some of the already provided support or evidence for certain causal hypotheses. The technological factors dimension and its identified sub-dimensions presented in this paper are embedded within a more holistic four-dimensional conceptual factors model describing the causes for ZF or VCF. The paper describing this overall conceptual model is written by the same group of authors and currently under revision for an Open Access Journal publication. The present paper expands on the technological factors dimension descriptions provided in the overall model paper and provides more detailed analyzes and concepts associated with how VC technology may affect users' perception, cognitive load, interaction and communication, possibly leading to stress, exhaustion and fatigue. The paper currently is a living document which will be expanded further with regard to the evidence for or against the impact of certain technological factors.
翻译:本文介绍了一种概念性、多层面的方法,以理解假定或甚至证明有助于形成Zoom Fatigue(ZF)或更普遍的视频会议Fatigue(VCF)的技术因素。随着Covid-19大流行的到来,对VC服务的使用急剧增加,导致关于ZF或VCF现象的越来越多的报告。本文的动机是,一些媒体机构最初开始辩论什么是Zomlife 疲劳,如何避免这种疲劳,以及一些涉及该主题的科学文件,其中载有相当假设性的假设,而且没有科学证据作为更充分的基础。这些作品大多承认缺乏证据,部分地提出了未来研究的方向。本文打算深化对VC技术相关文献的调查,并在可能情况下提供更多关于某些因果关系的假设的支持或证据。本文中列出的技术因素及其确定的分层因素将进一步嵌入一个更全面的四维概念模型,说明ZF或CF总体概念的理论和V类扩展的理论性解释。本文将进一步说明当前技术分析的作者和V级文件中的某些技术因素。